From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: First draft of Beta announcement |
Date: | 2017-05-12 18:22:38 |
Message-ID: | 4b00a10c-0a87-b28a-2476-48f17d7cf587@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 5/10/17 20:01, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks:
>
> Read it here:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=press.git;a=blob;f=releases/10/beta/10beta1.md;h=f0d2e6ad2637281194ce212f9b7553eff1301c58;hb=HEAD
>
> Please comment with improvements/suggestions/corrections, or submit them
> to the git repo if you have access.
I think the part about "an unusually high number of
backwards-incompatible changes" is unnecessarily scary. The number of
incompatible changes in the release notes is only slightly higher than
in previous releases (10: 19, 9.6: 13, 9.5: 12, 9.4: 22), and half of
those are removing ancient junk that no one was using.
I get that we want people to test and adjust their applications as early
as possible, but how about something like this instead: "Version 10
contains a few changes that are incompatible with prior major releases.
We encourage all users test it against their applications and platforms
as soon as possible."
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2017-05-12 18:23:56 | Re: First draft of Beta announcement |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2017-05-12 18:13:38 | Re: First draft of Beta announcement |