| From: | Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Date: | 2011-09-19 21:20:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4E77B211.9050002@freedomcircle.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Greg,
On 09/19/2011 04:44 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Not spending as much time sitting in meetings and fighting with other
> vendors is one of the competitive advantages PostgreSQL development has
> vs. the "big guys". There needs to be a pretty serious problem with
> your process before adding bureaucracy to it is anything but a backwards
> move. And standardization tends to attract lots of paperwork. Last
> thing you want to be competing with a big company on is doing that sort
> of big company work.
You have a point there. However, open source standardization doesn't
have to be patterned after closed source efforts. OTOH it's hard to
predict what form it should take. Perhaps it's simply a matter of
cross-pollination, i.e., the kind of interaction with MySQL groups that
occurred over the last year (I realize it wasn't just or even primarily
SQL-related).
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-09-19 21:47:19 | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-09-19 20:50:54 | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |