| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Date: | 2011-09-19 20:44:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4E77A9A1.4070408@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/19/2011 10:58 AM, Joe Abbate wrote:
> Maybe it's time for an open source SQL standard, one not controlled by
> the "big guys" and their IP claims.
>
Not spending as much time sitting in meetings and fighting with other
vendors is one of the competitive advantages PostgreSQL development has
vs. the "big guys". There needs to be a pretty serious problem with
your process before adding bureaucracy to it is anything but a backwards
move. And standardization tends to attract lots of paperwork. Last
thing you want to be competing with a big company on is doing that sort
of big company work.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-09-19 20:50:54 | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Previous Message | Dan McGee | 2011-09-19 20:36:50 | Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant |