| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: superusers are members of all roles? |
| Date: | 2011-09-12 01:40:13 |
| Message-ID: | 4E6D62FD.4070908@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/09/2011 11:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Is this a TODO?
>> I think so.
> Added to TODO:
>
> Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php
This turns out to be a one-liner.
Patch attached.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| nosuperhbagroup.patch | text/x-patch | 700 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-09-12 02:32:07 | Re: superusers are members of all roles? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-11 21:22:26 | Re: [WIP] Caching constant stable expressions per execution |