Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-09-12 02:32:07
Message-ID: 20110912023207.GQ12765@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> > Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php
>
> This turns out to be a one-liner.

I really don't know that I agree with removing this, to be honest.. I
haven't got time at the moment to really discuss it, but at the very
least, not being able to 'set role' to any user when postgres would be
REALLY annoying..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2011-09-12 03:08:25 Re: cheaper snapshots redux
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-09-12 01:40:13 Re: superusers are members of all roles?