| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff MacDonald <jam(at)zoidtechnologies(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Indication of db-shared tables |
| Date: | 2011-06-22 19:33:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4E024383.3010001@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/22/2011 03:24 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>> I am going to try to add descriptions for system tables for \d+ so maybe
>>> I can put it there.
>> That would be OK with me, I guess -- something like "shared system
>> catalog for databases", you mean?
> I was thinking "(shared)" as part of the description.
>
I'm a bit unclear who this is going to help much. If you know what a
shared table is you're pretty likely to know which tables are shared -
there aren't that many of them after all. If you don't, this description
is at least as likely to confuse you as help you in any way. I don't
have strong feelings, just a bit of a suspicion that this isn't going to
do much good.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-22 19:33:29 | Re: Indication of db-shared tables |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-22 19:29:33 | Re: Indication of db-shared tables |