Re: Indication of db-shared tables

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff MacDonald <jam(at)zoidtechnologies(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Date: 2011-06-22 19:29:33
Message-ID: 1308770929-sup-91@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié jun 22 15:24:40 -0400 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mi jun 22 14:31:51 -0400 2011:

> > > I am going to try to add descriptions for system tables for \d+ so maybe
> > > I can put it there.
> >
> > That would be OK with me, I guess -- something like "shared system
> > catalog for databases", you mean?
>
> I was thinking "(shared)" as part of the description.

Well, that's what I was proposing above, sans the (unnecessary?) parens.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-06-22 19:33:23 Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-06-22 19:26:44 Re: pg_dump vs malloc