Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta

Le 03/05/2011 15:49, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:24:53 am Dave Page wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> So far:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cio.com.au/article/384968/open_source_postgresql_9_1_beta_rele
>>>> ased/
>>>>
>>>> http://lwn.net/Articles/440666/ (subscriber-only content)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3932351/Po
>>>> stgreSQL-91-Gets-Synchronous.htm
>>>
>>> I have to wonder why these mention PGXN given that at the moment it's
>>> just a download site, providing similar functionality to software
>>> catalog on www.postgresql.org.
>>>
>>> When there is a command line client available, then sure, it should be
>>> promoted, but until then it's a WIP (I would say vapourware, but I
>>> that seems unfair, as I know David certainly is working on it).
>>
>> Well the same could be said about SQL/MED and SE-postgres, both new items at the
>> just getting started stage:)
>
> Putting aside the fact that Damien pointed out that the PGXN website
> is out of date (and therefore so is my information on the lack of a
> cli), no, those are not the same. The code for both projects is there
> in 9.1 and can be used for production applications. Those two features
> are in no way vapourware, nor are they a WIP, at least as far as the
> feature set for this release is concerned.
>

Dave,

I don't understand your last sentence. Are you still thinking that PGXN
client is vaporware or WIP ?

Personnaly, I think PGXN will be available for production server after
some beta tests. Just like SQL/MED and SE-postgres. I don't see why you
are being so harsh on PGXN. Frankly i don't understand your point.

While we're encouraging people to test the 9.1beta1 why not pointing
them the PGXN project, as it needs beta testers too ? In fact when
you're testing PGXN, you're also testing PostgreSQL Extensions, right ?

;-)

--
damien clochard
dalibo.com | dalibo.org