Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
Date: 2011-05-03 14:14:08
Message-ID: 201105030714.09214.adrian.klaver@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:49:30 am Dave Page wrote:

>
> Putting aside the fact that Damien pointed out that the PGXN website
> is out of date (and therefore so is my information on the lack of a
> cli), no, those are not the same. The code for both projects is there
> in 9.1 and can be used for production applications. Those two features
> are in no way vapourware, nor are they a WIP, at least as far as the
> feature set for this release is concerned.

The same applies to PGXN, the framework is there and people are using it, I fail
to see the distinction.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-05-03 14:17:50 Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
Previous Message damien clochard 2011-05-03 14:08:14 Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta