From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: windows consolidated cleanup |
Date: | 2011-04-24 15:10:56 |
Message-ID: | 4DB43D80.7060704@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/24/2011 09:11 AM, Andrew Chernow wrote:
> On 4/24/2011 1:29 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> The attached patch is intended to clean up a bunch of compiler
>> warnings seen on
>> Windows due to mismatches of signedness or constness, unused variables,
>> redefined macros and a missing prototype.
>>
>> It doesn't clean up all the warnings by any means, but it fixes quite
>> a few.
>>
>> One thing I'm a bit confused about is this type of warning:
>>
>> src\backend\utils\misc\guc-file.c(977): warning C4003: not enough actual
>> parameters for macro 'GUC_yywrap'
>>
>>
>> If someone can suggest a good fix That would be nice.
>>
>
> The macro is defined as taking one argument.
>
> // guc-file.c line 354
> #define GUC_yywrap(n) 1
>
> The macro is overriding the prototype declared at line 627, which has
> a void argument list (assuming YY_SKIP_YYWRAP is !defined). Since all
> code references to this do not provide an argument, I'd say the macro
> is incorrect.
Thanks for looking.
All our scanners are in fact defined with "%option noyywrap", so
YY_SKIP_WRAP is defined.
But the macro is incorrect unless you're generating a reentrant scanner
as we are for the core scanner (which is why we don't see this error for
the core scanner, only all the others).
I have a mildly ugly fix for it in pg_flex.bat (only MSVC compilers
complain about it AFAIK).
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-04-24 15:47:08 | Re: windows consolidated cleanup |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-04-24 14:57:59 | Re: windows consolidated cleanup |