Re: windows consolidated cleanup

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: windows consolidated cleanup
Date: 2011-04-24 15:10:56
Message-ID: 4DB43D80.7060704@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/24/2011 09:11 AM, Andrew Chernow wrote:
> On 4/24/2011 1:29 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> The attached patch is intended to clean up a bunch of compiler
>> warnings seen on
>> Windows due to mismatches of signedness or constness, unused variables,
>> redefined macros and a missing prototype.
>>
>> It doesn't clean up all the warnings by any means, but it fixes quite
>> a few.
>>
>> One thing I'm a bit confused about is this type of warning:
>>
>> src\backend\utils\misc\guc-file.c(977): warning C4003: not enough actual
>> parameters for macro 'GUC_yywrap'
>>
>>
>> If someone can suggest a good fix That would be nice.
>>
>
> The macro is defined as taking one argument.
>
> // guc-file.c line 354
> #define GUC_yywrap(n) 1
>
> The macro is overriding the prototype declared at line 627, which has
> a void argument list (assuming YY_SKIP_YYWRAP is !defined). Since all
> code references to this do not provide an argument, I'd say the macro
> is incorrect.

Thanks for looking.

All our scanners are in fact defined with "%option noyywrap", so
YY_SKIP_WRAP is defined.

But the macro is incorrect unless you're generating a reentrant scanner
as we are for the core scanner (which is why we don't see this error for
the core scanner, only all the others).

I have a mildly ugly fix for it in pg_flex.bat (only MSVC compilers
complain about it AFAIK).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-24 15:47:08 Re: windows consolidated cleanup
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-24 14:57:59 Re: windows consolidated cleanup