| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Quick Extensions Question |
| Date: | 2011-03-03 18:49:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4D6F8E55020000250003B3BB@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It's pretty important that we don't design ourselves into a
>> corner her
>
> Which is why my suggestion is pretty much free from any design
Now you're scaring me. I read that as "the proposed design is free
from the influence of any design effort." That's precisely how you
can find yourself standing in a corner with wet paint on the floor
all around you.
At a minimum you would need to specify the format of the dependency
list and either some header and or terminator or some specification
of something which *can't* be in the list. It would be ironic if
our extensions configuration wasn't extensible.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-03-03 18:52:15 | Re: Quick Extensions Question |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2011-03-03 18:45:52 | Time zone database |