Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date: 2011-02-28 19:47:22
Message-ID: 4D6BFBCA.8040000@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em 28-02-2011 15:50, Tom Lane escreveu:
> Ultimately we need to think of a reporting mechanism that's a bit
> smarter than "rewrite the whole file for any update" ...
>
What about splitting statistic file per database?

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-02-28 19:47:23 Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-28 19:39:19 Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...