Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date: 2011-02-28 20:03:33
Message-ID: 28962.1298923413@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> Em 28-02-2011 15:50, Tom Lane escreveu:
>> Ultimately we need to think of a reporting mechanism that's a bit
>> smarter than "rewrite the whole file for any update" ...

> What about splitting statistic file per database?

That would improve matters for some usage patterns, but I'm afraid
only a minority.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-28 20:24:41 Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-28 20:02:30 Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...