From: | eric(dot)kolotyluk at gmail(dot)com (Eric Kolotyluk) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] Windows binaries |
Date: | 2011-01-24 18:37:09 |
Message-ID: | 4D3DC6D5.1030006@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
On 2011-01-24 10:23 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:13:10 -0000, Eric Kolotyluk
> <eric.kolotyluk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dependency Walker reports that jvm.dll, msvcr71.dll, and msvcr90.dll
>> are all x86 - as is pljava.dll and all the other postgres DLLs. Why
>> would the DLLs need to be 64-bit?
>
> Sorry, I thought you were running a 64bit PostgreSQL server.
>
>> I am using Java 6.
>
> Which is fine.
>
>> I have copied hpi.dll, verify.dll, java.dll, and zip.dll to the lib
>> directory. I could not find dbx_agent.dll
>
> Which is normal, you don't need dbx_agent.
>
>> Again, why would it expect 64 bit DLLs when I am running 32-bit
>> postgres and 32-bit Java?
>
> I have no idea. To reverse my previous statement: it seems to be
> finding 64bit DLLs where it exects 32bits.
>
>> However, Dependency Walker is listing a lot of other 64-bit DLLs for
>> some reason.
>
> ...
>
>> jvm.dll is in the same directory as pljava.dll. At first it was not
>> and Dependency Walker complained it was missing, so I added it and
>> Dependency Walker stopped complaining.
>
> This is beyond my expertiese with Windows, I do not really know how it
> finds DLLs (I thought it used PATH) and I'm afraid I can't help you
> much further. I would at this point be asking in Windows specific
> forums and/or real time chats such as ##windows on the Freenode irc
> network.
>
What is ##windows? Is that some sort of Twitter thing?
Cheers, Eric
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson | 2011-01-24 18:43:25 | [Pljava-dev] Windows binaries |
Previous Message | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson | 2011-01-24 18:23:39 | [Pljava-dev] Windows binaries |