Re: review: FDW API

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: FDW API
Date: 2011-01-21 16:05:44
Message-ID: 4D39AED8.20606@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.01.2011 17:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> How much review have you done of parts (3) and (4)?

Not much. I'm getting there..

> The key issue for
> all of the FDW work in progress seems to be what the handler API is
> going to look like, and so once we get that committed it will unblock
> a lot of other things.

Yep. The API that's there now was originally suggested by me, so I
probably won't have big complaints about it. I'll have to also look at
the PostgreSQL and file implementations of it to see that it really fits
the bill.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-21 16:10:53 Re: sepgsql contrib module
Previous Message Garick Hamlin 2011-01-21 16:00:54 Re: One Role, Two Passwords