From: | Garick Hamlin <ghamlin(at)isc(dot)upenn(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: One Role, Two Passwords |
Date: | 2011-01-21 16:00:54 |
Message-ID: | 20110121160053.GA2282@isc.upenn.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:55:42PM -0500, Daniel Farina wrote:
> The problem is that running a reliable,
> centralized LDAP service is not justifiable as compared to role
> mangling on a per-node level, and the role mangling seems has some
> shortcomings that are negotiable with gritted teeth.
Wandering slightly off-topic here...
I often find RADIUS is an easier way to setup a highly available
(and perhaps too flexible) AuthN/AuthZ service, but I've never used
PG's RADIUS implementation. I was curious and I took a look at
the documentation...
I can't tell if PG supports querying a secondary RADIUS server?
I don't see how I would do it with the syntax here ...
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/auth-methods.html
Are multiple servers not supported?
Garick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-01-21 16:05:44 | Re: review: FDW API |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-01-21 16:00:41 | Re: sepgsql contrib module |