| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
| Date: | 2010-11-18 23:41:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4CE5B99E.9020802@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/18/2010 06:06 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Well, a good reason for that might be that unnest() is pretty new... Most code
> I read has been initially written quite a bit earlier. Seeing 8.4 in
> production is only starting to get common.
I guess we must have more adventurous customers than you :-)
(Incidentally, there is a (slow but still very useful) userland version
of unnest that works with 8.3.)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2010-11-19 01:34:34 | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-11-18 23:33:44 | UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) |