From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY (AND POSSIBLY OTHER STUFF) |
Date: | 2010-11-18 23:33:44 |
Message-ID: | 20101118233344.GV1669@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Folks,
I'd like to see about getting an enhanced UNNEST, first the one
according to the SQL standard, namely with an optional WITH ORDINALITY
clause, and possibly some extra enhancements.
In order to get WITH ORDINALITY, would it be better to change gram.y
to account for both WITH ORDINALITY and without, or just for the WITH
ORDINALITY case?
Also, there's been some enthusiasm for a different kind of enhancement
of UNNEST, which would go something like this:
UNNEST(anyarray, number_of_dimensions_to_unnest)
That'd probably be a separate patch, though.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-18 23:41:18 | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-18 23:06:07 | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |