Re: Win2k? Really?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win2k? Really?
Date: 2010-10-04 07:31:27
Message-ID: 4CA982CF.6040801@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/10/10 13:58, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The FAQ says that win2k is supported, but the last buildfarm activity
> for win2k was ages ago, and we've had a post recently saying it doesn't
> work.

Ah, never mind. The Windows-specific bits of the FAQ were badly out of
date in other places (still talking about the MSI installer, etc) so
I've gone over and cleaned it up. In the process I've removed references
to supported versions as much as possible, instead linking to existing
sources of such information like the download pages.

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing: http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Farber 2010-10-04 09:20:34 Any advice on debugging hanging postgresql-8.1.21 (many postmaster's)
Previous Message Carlo Stonebanks 2010-10-04 06:10:54 PL/TCL Unkown module