Win2k? Really?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Win2k? Really?
Date: 2010-10-04 05:58:27
Message-ID: 4CA96D03.2070504@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi all

The FAQ says that win2k is supported, but the last buildfarm activity
for win2k was ages ago, and we've had a post recently saying it doesn't
work.

Buildfarm members for win2k:

bandicoot - 1297 days ago
bee - 1745 days ago
trout - 1122 days ago

Should win2k be declared dead and dropped from the supported platform
list? It's over 10 years old, after all, and there's no evidence it's
tested anymore.

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing: http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlo Stonebanks 2010-10-04 06:10:54 PL/TCL Unkown module
Previous Message Tommy Gildseth 2010-10-04 05:09:21 Re: rotate psql output