Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

On 2010/09/29 20:04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2010-09-28 at 11:38 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>> On 2010/09/28 10:31, Greg Smith wrote:
>>> If the patch you generated applies to the git version of the repo cleanly, you may be fine for now. The anon-cvs version is mainly intended as a source to get a copy of the source code just to compile or read, not to develop patches against. For that it would be better to switch to git when you get some time to spend on that.
>>
>> So, I have created another patch from git repository.
>> The attached one could be applied to the latest code.
>
> Committed, with some adjustments. Notably, you probably misinterpreted
> the meaning of the -600 error code from the comment in header file.
> Also, the -600 and -601 codes are not generated by the current code at
> all, so I have commented them out in the documentation.

Thank you for the commit.

Yes, I have checked only the header file (ecpgerrno.h), and not checked
several caller functions. So, your commit seems to be an appropriate way.

Thanks,
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>