Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
Date: 2010-09-29 11:04:32
Message-ID: 1285758272.25458.17.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-general

On tis, 2010-09-28 at 11:38 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> On 2010/09/28 10:31, Greg Smith wrote:
> > If the patch you generated applies to the git version of the repo cleanly, you may be fine for now. The anon-cvs version is mainly intended as a source to get a copy of the source code just to compile or read, not to develop patches against. For that it would be better to switch to git when you get some time to spend on that.
>
> So, I have created another patch from git repository.
> The attached one could be applied to the latest code.

Committed, with some adjustments. Notably, you probably misinterpreted
the meaning of the -600 error code from the comment in header file.
Also, the -600 and -601 codes are not generated by the current code at
all, so I have commented them out in the documentation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2010-09-29 12:17:22 Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-09-28 15:37:27 Re: 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2010-09-29 12:17:22 Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2010-09-29 11:00:37 Re: optimizing a query with sub select