Re: Synchronous replication

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication
Date: 2010-08-09 21:22:14
Message-ID: 4C607186.7050006@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wonder if we can continue to rely on the pg_sleep() loop for sleeping
in walsender. On those platforms where interrupts don't interrupt sleep,
sending the signal is not going to promptly wake up walsender. That was
fine before, but any delay is going to be poison to synchronous
replication performance.

Thoughts?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-09 21:34:55 Re: Synchronous replication
Previous Message Kristian Larsson 2010-08-09 21:01:42 Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf