From: | Kristian Larsson <kristian(at)spritelink(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf |
Date: | 2010-08-09 21:01:42 |
Message-ID: | 20100809210141.GG91970@spritelink.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 03:25:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Here is a patch for host name support in pg_hba.conf.
>
> My recollection is that the previous discussions got stuck on the cost
> of doing DNS lookups for every connect; and the obvious solution of
> trying to cache the names was shot down on the basis of not knowing when
> to flush the cache. Have you decided that people who want this feature
> will just have to pay that cost? If so, I think the documentation needs
> to be a bit more explicit about names being more expensive than IP
> addresses in pg_hba.conf.
I am also a bit scared of the startup cost for each connection.
In which order are things evaluated? What if I only include IP
addresses in my pg_hba, will it still cost me a DNS lookup or
two?
Kind regards,
Kristian.
--
Kristian Larsson KLL-RIPE
+46 704 264511 kll(at)spritelink(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-08-09 21:22:14 | Re: Synchronous replication |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-08-09 21:00:47 | Re: Synchronous replication |