| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andy Balholm" <andy(at)balholm(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dividing money by money |
| Date: | 2010-07-16 15:11:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4C403057020000250003370B@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The only way I'd be willing to label those things immutable was if
> we did something to lock down lc_monetary for the life of a
> database (ie, make it work more like lc_collate does now). Which
> might be a good idea, but it's not how it works today.
Interesting. In general, what is involved in locking something like
this down for the life of a database?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-07-16 15:11:59 | Re: SHOW TABLES |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2010-07-16 15:04:27 | Re: psql auto-completion for multiple where clauses |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-16 16:21:13 | Re: dividing money by money |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-16 14:43:16 | Re: dividing money by money |