From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Date: | 2010-05-12 21:39:41 |
Message-ID: | 4BEB201D.3000906@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon, Robert,
> He was also testing SR, yet you haven't breathed a word about that for
> some strange reason. It didn't APPEAR like it was HS at all, not from
> basic logic or from technical knowledge. So you'll have to forgive me if
> I don't leap into action when you say something is an HS problem in the
> future.
Can we please chill out on this some? Especially since we now have an
actual reproduceable bug?
Simon, it's natural for people to come to you because you are
knowledgeable and responsive. You should take it as a compliment.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-05-12 21:40:44 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-12 21:34:38 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |