Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date: 2010-05-12 21:34:38
Message-ID: 1273700078.308.1239.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 14:43 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:

> I thought that it
> would be a good idea for Simon to look at it because, on the surface,
> it APPEARS to have something to do with Hot Standby, since that's what
> Stefan was testing when he found it.

He was also testing SR, yet you haven't breathed a word about that for
some strange reason. It didn't APPEAR like it was HS at all, not from
basic logic or from technical knowledge. So you'll have to forgive me if
I don't leap into action when you say something is an HS problem in the
future.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-12 21:39:41 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-12 21:26:34 Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Bug-fix and new feature of pg_lesslog is released