From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CP949 for EUC-KR? |
Date: | 2010-04-27 19:40:32 |
Message-ID: | 4BD73DB0.6090307@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> That's it! We should have added an additional alias to chklocale, too.
>
> Index: src/port/chklocale.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src/port/chklocale.c (HEAD)
> +++ src/port/chklocale.c (fixed)
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@
> {PG_GBK, "CP936"},
>
> {PG_UHC, "UHC"},
> + {PG_UHC, "CP949"},
>
> {PG_JOHAB, "JOHAB"},
> {PG_JOHAB, "CP1361"},
Yeah, seems correct.
> Except UHC, we don't have any codepage aliases for the encodings below.
> I assume we don't need to add CPxxx because Windows does not have
> corresponding codepages for them, right?
>
> {PG_LATIN6, "ISO-8859-10"},
> {PG_LATIN7, "ISO-8859-13"},
> {PG_LATIN8, "ISO-8859-14"},
> {PG_LATIN10, "ISO-8859-16"},
> {PG_SHIFT_JIS_2004, "SJIS_2004"},
Yeah, I guess so. I can't find Windows codepages for these either, by
google.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-27 20:18:53 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-27 19:29:13 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |