Re: CP949 for EUC-KR?

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> > Should we add (or replace) CP949 for EUC-KR?
>
> No. CP949 is not plain EUC-KR, but EUC-KR with some extensions (UHC). At
> least on CVS HEAD, we recognize CP949 as an alias for the PostgreSQL
> PG_UHC encoding.

That's it! We should have added an additional alias to chklocale, too.

Index: src/port/chklocale.c
===================================================================
--- src/port/chklocale.c (HEAD)
+++ src/port/chklocale.c (fixed)
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@
{PG_GBK, "CP936"},

{PG_UHC, "UHC"},
+ {PG_UHC, "CP949"},

{PG_JOHAB, "JOHAB"},
{PG_JOHAB, "CP1361"},

Except UHC, we don't have any codepage aliases for the encodings below.
I assume we don't need to add CPxxx because Windows does not have
corresponding codepages for them, right?

{PG_LATIN6, "ISO-8859-10"},
{PG_LATIN7, "ISO-8859-13"},
{PG_LATIN8, "ISO-8859-14"},
{PG_LATIN10, "ISO-8859-16"},
{PG_SHIFT_JIS_2004, "SJIS_2004"},

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center