From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vladimir Rusinov <vladimir(at)greenmice(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Any good olap benchmarks? |
Date: | 2010-03-31 11:12:47 |
Message-ID: | 4BB32E2F.8030304@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Vladimir Rusinov wrote:
> I'm searching for any good OLAP-like benchmark: I need some benchmark
> with complex selects run on 10-30G dataset, something like this:
> http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:wikistat:start, but this is
> only a draft and would only be released for mysql.
>
I already intended to convert and run Vadim's Wikipedia statistics
benchmark when I get to it; as we're busy getting the next PostgreSQL
release out the door right now I just haven't gotten to it yet. I
expect we can get that added into their mix on the same hardware once
I'm done.
I've linked to everything I'm aware of at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Category:Benchmarking and the TPC-H page
has probably the most relevant information for OLAP. PostgreSQL doesn't
do particularly well on OLAP benchmarks yet due to how queries are
limited by a single processor, making it hard to get excited about
publishing the results.
Greenplum ran some interesting tests of their own software against
PostgreSQL at http://community.greenplum.com/showthread.php?t=113 you
might find interesting. That includes a fairly easy to use TPC-H like
test kit program, and by showing where they did much better is suggest
the areas that community Postgres struggles relative to software that
handles parallel query across multiple cores/servers.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-03-31 12:26:47 | Re: Statistics Collector not collecting server activities |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-03-31 10:55:11 | Re: Virtualization vs. sharing a server |