From: | lst_hoe02(at)kwsoft(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Any good olap benchmarks? |
Date: | 2010-03-31 13:19:24 |
Message-ID: | 20100331151924.174773g693l639c0@webmail.kwsoft.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Zitat von Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> I've linked to everything I'm aware of at
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Category:Benchmarking and the TPC-H
> page has probably the most relevant information for OLAP.
> PostgreSQL doesn't do particularly well on OLAP benchmarks yet due
> to how queries are limited by a single processor, making it hard to
> get excited about publishing the results.
>
> Greenplum ran some interesting tests of their own software against
> PostgreSQL at http://community.greenplum.com/showthread.php?t=113
> you might find interesting. That includes a fairly easy to use
> TPC-H like test kit program, and by showing where they did much
> better is suggest the areas that community Postgres struggles
> relative to software that handles parallel query across multiple
> cores/servers.
I maybe wrong but this looks like "partitioning" PostgreSQL to me???
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gnanakumar | 2010-03-31 13:22:53 | Re: Statistics Collector not collecting server activities |
Previous Message | Brad Nicholson | 2010-03-31 12:27:56 | Re: Migrate postgres to newer hardware |