Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Date: 2010-02-27 10:40:24
Message-ID: 4B88F698.4000304@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What happened to this patch?
>>
>
> Returned with feedback in October after receiving a lot of review, no
> updated version submitted since then:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=98
>

Hmm - I would say a bit of review rather than a lot :-)

The feeling I received from the various comments was a lukewarm level of
interest at best, so I must confess that I let other things take
precedence. Also I was after some clear feedback about whether a
separate stats utility was necessary at all given we have Dtrace support
- despite this not being available for Linux... and the only comment
dealing to this concern is from Gokul just now!

I'd also like to take the opportunity to express a little frustration
about the commitfest business - really all I wanted was the patch
*reviewed* as WIP - it seemed that in order to do that I needed to enter
it into the various commitfests... then I was faced with comments to the
effect that it was not ready for commit so should not have been entered
into a commifest at all... sigh, a bit of an enthusiasm killer I'm afraid...

regards

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rémi Zara 2010-02-27 13:40:13 Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-02-27 09:33:34 Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration