From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |
Date: | 2010-02-27 09:33:34 |
Message-ID: | 4B88E6EE.2000604@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Doesn't the system already adjust the delay based on the length of slave
>>> transactions, e.g. max_standby_delay. It seems there is no need for a
>>> user switch --- just max_standby_delay really high.
>> Well that GUC looks like it allows to set a compromise between HA and
>> reporting, not to say "do not ever give the priority to the replay while
>> I'm running my reports". At least that's how I understand it.
>
> max_standby_delay=-1 does that. The documentation needs to be updated to
> reflect that, it currently says:
>
>> There is no wait-forever setting because of the potential for deadlock which that setting would introduce. This parameter can only be set in the postgresql.conf file or on the server command line.
>
> but that is false, -1 means wait forever. Simon removed that option at
> one point, but it was later put back and apparently the documentation
> was never updated.
I've put back the mention of max_standby_delay=-1 option in the docs.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2010-02-27 10:40:24 | Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-02-27 09:07:32 | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |