Re: [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jim Cox <shakahshakah(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server
Date: 2010-02-23 18:21:02
Message-ID: 4B841C8E.5000102@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/23/10 10:14 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> What happened to this patch? I don't see any objections, but it was not
>> applied.
>
> I think that the patch author never added it to the open CommitFest
> and nobody else thought it was important enough to pick up. It looks
> innocuous to me; want to go ahead and apply?

I'd say yes. It's post-freeze, but this falls into the class of "oops,
we forgot about this patch" which the CFs were designed to prevent.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-02-23 18:22:03 Re: More robust pg_hba.conf parsing/error logging
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-23 18:20:20 Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen