| From: | David E(dot) Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
| Date: | 2009-10-21 16:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | 4B50CE5F-AC76-44D9-9FE4-B7E8783310AA@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:40 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> Ooh, yeah, dunno how I missed that.
>>
>> I think we're probably stuck in 8.4, but we should fix it going
>> forward. Would you make a quick check if any of the other citext
>> functions have the same bug?
>
> I've fixed it in my [version for 8.3](https://svn.kineticode.com/citext/trunk
> ). Is there a straight-foward way to check such a thing
> programmatically, with a query perhaps? Or should I just put aside
> an hour to do an audit?
FWIW, I think that this is a bug, and that the variation from the text
version will be unexpected. I recommend fixing it for 8.4.2.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-21 16:46:38 | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-10-21 16:40:30 | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |