| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME? |
| Date: | 2009-11-05 15:55:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4AF2F57B.6090609@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/5/2009 9:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> Did we get the keyword from anyplace? Is it an Oracleism or MSSQLism
>> or anything?
>
> Hmm, that is a good question. I had assumed it was an Oracle-ism,
> but it doesn't seem to be described anywhere in my copy of the PL/SQL
> manual (which is a bit old but newer than plpgsql...) I dunno where
> Jan got it from.
And I don't remember why it was necessary or seemed like a good idea.
Jan
--
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-11-05 17:24:43 | Typed tables |
| Previous Message | Erik Aronesty | 2009-11-05 15:48:48 | using pg_comparator as replication |