Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Date: 2009-11-05 14:51:48
Message-ID: 20080.1257432708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Did we get the keyword from anyplace? Is it an Oracleism or MSSQLism
> or anything?

Hmm, that is a good question. I had assumed it was an Oracle-ism,
but it doesn't seem to be described anywhere in my copy of the PL/SQL
manual (which is a bit old but newer than plpgsql...) I dunno where
Jan got it from.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-05 14:56:21 Re: operator exclusion constraints
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-11-05 14:51:06 Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?