Re: Privileges and inheritance

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Privileges and inheritance
Date: 2009-10-06 14:46:23
Message-ID: 4ACB583F.3040401@kaigai.gr.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
>> Was it uncertain what I wanted to say for the proposition?
>
> No: it's that nobody sees any particular value in making a fundamental
> restructuring of the permissions system like that. What you propose
> would be far harder/more complicated to implement, to understand,
> or to use.

Yes, I agree.
If we actually implement the new perspective perfectly, it needs complex
implementation due to the differences from physical structure.

However, it seems to me the current proposition tries to adopt a mixed
perspectives depending on the situation....

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-06 14:48:39 Re: Patch: create or replace language
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-10-06 14:43:34 Re: moving system catalogs to another tablespace