Re: Patch: create or replace language

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: create or replace language
Date: 2009-10-06 14:48:39
Message-ID: 1543.1254840519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe I'm out of line to say this, but it seems to me that we should
> not even be looking at newly-submitted patches at this point.

It would have been more work to put it in the queue to reject later
than to reject it now ;-). Besides, this way Andreas has a chance
to rewrite it into something acceptable before the next CF.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-10-06 14:49:46 Re: Patch: create or replace language
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-10-06 14:46:23 Re: Privileges and inheritance