From: | Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, fulan Peng <fulanpeng(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Date: | 2009-09-12 19:57:15 |
Message-ID: | 4AABFD1B.1050005@mark.mielke.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 09/12/2009 03:48 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> This would allow for 220M+ databases. I'm not sure how bad it'd be to
> introduce another field to pg_database which provides the directory (as
> it'd now be distinct from the oid..) or if that might require alot of
> changes. Not sure how easy it'd be to implement something to address
> this problem while we continue to tie the directory name to the oid.
>
Other than bragging rights - what part of this would be a GOOD thing? :-)
My God - I thought 32k databases in the same directory was insane.
220M+???????
Hehehe...
If you can patch PostgreSQL to support such extremes without hurting my
performance - I'll shut up and leave you be. :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
Mark Mielke<mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-12 20:02:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2009-09-12 19:52:32 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-12 20:02:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2009-09-12 19:52:32 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |