From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, fulan Peng <fulanpeng(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Date: | 2009-09-12 20:02:11 |
Message-ID: | 11995.1252785731@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Mark Mielke (mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc) wrote:
>> No matter what scheme PostgreSQL uses for storing the data, there can be
>> underlying file system limitations.
> This is true, but there's a reason we only create 1GB files too. I
> wouldn't be against a scheme such as described to minimize the impact to
> PG of these limitations.
There are plenty of filesystems available that do not have this silly
limitation, so I don't see a reason for us to work around it. If the
OP is on a platform that only offers UFS and ZFS, and he doesn't like
either of those, maybe he should find another platform.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-12 20:15:09 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2009-09-12 19:57:15 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-12 20:15:09 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2009-09-12 19:57:15 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |