Re: REGRESS_OPTS versus MSVC build scripts

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: REGRESS_OPTS versus MSVC build scripts
Date: 2009-08-18 16:48:16
Message-ID: 4A8ADB50.4010608@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I believe (but won't be able to prove for another few hours) that the
> reason the MSVC buildfarm members are failing on contrib/unaccent,
> as seen here:
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mastodon&dt=2009-08-18%2013:00:00
> is that they are not running the test in a UTF8-encoded database.
> And the reason for *that* is that the MSVC build infrastructure pays no
> attention to REGRESS_OPTS. Instead it's got hardwired values for all
> the pg_regress command line options, and of course it needs to hardwire
> several different sets of values for different tests :-(.
>
> I think it's time to fix that properly by making the perl scripts
> dredge REGRESS_OPTS out of the makefiles. My perl-fu is not up to
> the task, however. Anybody want to do it?
>
> This seems like a stop-ship issue for 8.5alpha1, even though it's only
> a contrib regression test that's certain to fail; so I think it's a
> bit urgent.
>
>
>

I will take a look.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-18 17:00:27 Re: Index Selection Tool For PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-18 16:33:13 REGRESS_OPTS versus MSVC build scripts