Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: 2009-08-05 16:48:37
Message-ID: 4A79B7E5.1020509@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure whether there is consensus on not using GRANT ON VIEW
> (ie, having these patches treat tables and views alike). I was waiting
> to see if Stephen would put forward a convincing counterargument ...
>
>
>

Conceptually it is right, I think. A view is a virtual table, so the
counter-argument would need to be pretty good ISTM.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-08-05 16:51:41 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-08-05 16:48:33 CommitFest 2009-07: Closing Soon