Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: 2009-08-05 16:40:58
Message-ID: 20810.1249490458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My understanding is that this patch will need to be reworked as well
> based on Tom's comments on "DefaultACLs". Does that sound right?
> Should we expect a new version this week, or defer this until the
> September CommitFest?

I was planning to go review that patch too, even though it's presumably
not committable yet.

I'm not sure whether there is consensus on not using GRANT ON VIEW
(ie, having these patches treat tables and views alike). I was waiting
to see if Stephen would put forward a convincing counterargument ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-08-05 16:48:33 CommitFest 2009-07: Closing Soon
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-08-05 16:34:03 Re: Prefix support for synonym dictionary