Re: psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

From: Andreas Wenk <a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing
Date: 2009-07-22 21:02:35
Message-ID: 4A677E6B.6070102@netzmeister-st-pauli.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files,
>> and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The
>> masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about
>> this?
>
> I must admit I don't know :-)
>
hm - I don't wanna make it more complicate as it is ... Peter wrote as
the first answer to this post to do so - so actually I could do it (I
had a short look to the po files two minutes ago -> /src/bin/psql/po/).
I leave the desicion up to ;-)

Cheers

Andy

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Klaassen 2009-07-22 21:14:23 table.column in query results?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-22 20:43:28 Re: psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing