Re: psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Wenk <a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing
Date: 2009-07-22 20:43:28
Message-ID: 20090722204328.GM32074@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

> We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files,
> and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The
> masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about
> this?

I must admit I don't know :-)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Wenk 2009-07-22 21:02:35 Re: psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing
Previous Message Knut P. Lehre 2009-07-22 20:33:48 8.4.0 installer for Windows from EnterpriseDB does not seem to include pgagent