From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: windows shared memory error |
Date: | 2009-05-05 09:50:28 |
Message-ID: | 4A000BE4.6080702@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Passes my tests, but I can't really reproduce the requirement to retry,
>> so I haven't been able to test that part :(
>
> The patch looks sane to me. If you want to test, perhaps reducing the
> sleep to 1 msec or so would reproduce the need to go around the loop
> more than once. (Don't forget to put the machine under additional
> load, too.)
I've applied this to HEAD and 8.3 so we can get some buildfarm testing
on it as well.
Andrew, any chance you can get 8.3-tip tested with your client? Or at
least in your own reproducable-environment?
I didn't backpatch to 8.2, because the code is completely different
there. We should probably consider doing it once we know if this fixes
the actual issue, but I don't want to spend the effort on backporting it
until we know it works.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-05-05 09:53:40 | Re: "could not reattach to shared memory" captured in buildfarm |
Previous Message | PFC | 2009-05-05 09:15:51 | Re: [HACKERS] high shared buffer and swap |