Re: windows shared memory error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: windows shared memory error
Date: 2009-05-04 23:57:59
Message-ID: 20982.1241481479@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Passes my tests, but I can't really reproduce the requirement to retry,
> so I haven't been able to test that part :(

The patch looks sane to me. If you want to test, perhaps reducing the
sleep to 1 msec or so would reproduce the need to go around the loop
more than once. (Don't forget to put the machine under additional
load, too.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-05 00:01:05 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-04 23:56:22 Re: windows shared memory error