| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recognition Guidelines Patch |
| Date: | 2017-07-30 21:04:57 |
| Message-ID: | 49e4770a-abd7-3b90-2069-1d19460067bc@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 07/30/2017 01:40 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
>> On Jul 30, 2017, at 13:36, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> I think this is a valid request and I would +1 it too, however I would like to push implementation to a different patch / thread as AFAIK there needs to be a “funds group” set up.
>
> If there is consensus that having the group is a good idea, I'd recommend not pushing this patch until it is set up, rather than having it go up once with an individual and then again with a mailing list. It seems fairly straight-forward to set up the group; is there a reason we can't hold the patch for that administrative task?
The PostgreSQL Funds Group already exists and has a mailing list at that
address (funds-group <funds-group(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGFGCharter
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGFGMembers
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2017-07-30 21:05:51 | Re: Recognition Guidelines Patch |
| Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2017-07-30 20:40:30 | Re: Recognition Guidelines Patch |