Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :)

From: "Dave Held" <dave(dot)held(at)arrayservicesgrp(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :)
Date: 2005-04-22 17:10:23
Message-ID: 49E94D0CFCD4DB43AFBA928DDD20C8F9026184CE@asg002.asg.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:42 AM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> Uhmmm that isn't always true. The switch from 2.x to 3.x was fairly
> painful. Standards can change and do often.

That depends on how you define "often". I wouldn't call 10 years from
C89 to C99 or C++98 to "C++0x" (7 years and counting) "often". The
majority of change from 2.x to 3.x, at least on the C++ side of things,
had to do with moving into conformance with a standard that had been
around for quite a while. Now that GCC is doing pretty well w.r.t.
conformance, I don't see any major upheavals for a while. I'm sure the
new optimizer changes will introduce some issues to deal with, but on a
source code level I don't see why Postgres would have to work around them.

__
David B. Held
Software Engineer/Array Services Group
200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377
320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 17:14:56 Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-22 17:05:42 Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :)